PortfoliosLab logo
BAM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BAM and ^GSPC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BAM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BAM:

1.50

^GSPC:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

BAM:

2.06

^GSPC:

1.03

Omega Ratio

BAM:

1.28

^GSPC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

BAM:

1.75

^GSPC:

0.67

Martin Ratio

BAM:

5.63

^GSPC:

2.57

Ulcer Index

BAM:

9.21%

^GSPC:

4.93%

Daily Std Dev

BAM:

33.30%

^GSPC:

19.67%

Max Drawdown

BAM:

-29.54%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

BAM:

-5.60%

^GSPC:

-4.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -0.64% return.


BAM

YTD

6.89%

1M

21.48%

6M

0.88%

1Y

49.50%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-0.64%

1M

8.97%

6M

-2.62%

1Y

11.90%

5Y*

15.76%

10Y*

10.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAM vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAM is 8989
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAM is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAM is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAM is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAM is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAM is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BAM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

BAM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM drawdown since its inception was -29.54%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BAM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 6.29%. This indicates that BAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...